This page of math jokes totally made me LOL at my desk, gaining fairly odd looks from others, since I rarely do that...
This is the one that made me guffaw:
Thursday, December 28, 2006
things that make me laugh
Ok, I realize that at times my sense of humor is, well, bizarre. I *really* got a kick out of celebrating my 100,000th birthday, for example. (32 decimal = 100000 binary).
This page of math jokes totally made me LOL at my desk, gaining fairly odd looks from others, since I rarely do that...
This is the one that made me guffaw:
This page of math jokes totally made me LOL at my desk, gaining fairly odd looks from others, since I rarely do that...
This is the one that made me guffaw:
Wednesday, November 29, 2006
A loaf of bread...
WooHoo for YouTube!!! I can't count the number of times I've had conversations with people (of my age group) about the skit from Sesame Street where the kid has to remember what to buy at the store. "A loaf of bread, a container of milk, and a stick of buttah..." A lot of people would argue with me about the middle one... that it wasn't a *container* of milk. HA! I was RIGHT!
Sesame Street - A loaf of bread... from YouTube.com.
This makes me ridiculously happy.
Sesame Street - A loaf of bread... from YouTube.com.
This makes me ridiculously happy.
Sunday, November 19, 2006
Dancing with the stars DEBACLE
I steadfastly maintain that the same basic principles are responsible for both Emmitt winning Dancing with the Stars over the extremely more talented Mario as are responsible for Bush being president. Look, people, I'm not saying Emmitt is a *bad* dancer. Not at all. He's a gazillion times better than me, for example. But to put him in even the same competition as Mario is kinda ridiculous. And I'm not just saying that because Mario is on my Christmas wishlist.
Whomever these people are.... these people who think Emmitt deserved to win over Mario.... those are NOT my kind of people. This is why I feel like a freak when generalizations are made about people. About Americans. They are never talking about ME! They're talking about the kind of people who shop at Walmart. Oh, come on, you know who I mean. Even if you yourself shop at Walmart for some bizarre reason, you've surely noticed that there IS a "type" of person there, right? That's who I mean.
I just don't get it. I don't get them. But, I figure they must think the same thing about me. And then I wonder if they even wonder about other people -- people like me, for example. I just don't know.
Whomever these people are.... these people who think Emmitt deserved to win over Mario.... those are NOT my kind of people. This is why I feel like a freak when generalizations are made about people. About Americans. They are never talking about ME! They're talking about the kind of people who shop at Walmart. Oh, come on, you know who I mean. Even if you yourself shop at Walmart for some bizarre reason, you've surely noticed that there IS a "type" of person there, right? That's who I mean.
I just don't get it. I don't get them. But, I figure they must think the same thing about me. And then I wonder if they even wonder about other people -- people like me, for example. I just don't know.
Thursday, October 26, 2006
Making the connection between a sound and a reward changes brain and behavior
Making the connection between a sound and a reward changes brain and behavior
I wonder what sort of connection my mind made between my mom's keys and something "good."
I swear I can recognize her keys -- or at least I could back when she was working and had a huge set of them -- out of a crowd.
Wouldn't the same sort of connection happen if one connected a punishment, instead of a reward, with a sound? Ok, I admit I have not read the original research article. I'm assuming they only tested for reward and not for punishment. I guess.
The little blurb I linked to above also mentions people being able to recognize their own cell phone's ring. I don't. Recognize mine, that is. However, I DO notice if the little beep telling me I have a text message rings. I'll hear and notice that even if my phone is in a different room in my house. But, the call ringtone? I don't hear that even if it's right next to me sometimes.
I wonder what sort of connection my mind made between my mom's keys and something "good."
I swear I can recognize her keys -- or at least I could back when she was working and had a huge set of them -- out of a crowd.
Wouldn't the same sort of connection happen if one connected a punishment, instead of a reward, with a sound? Ok, I admit I have not read the original research article. I'm assuming they only tested for reward and not for punishment. I guess.
The little blurb I linked to above also mentions people being able to recognize their own cell phone's ring. I don't. Recognize mine, that is. However, I DO notice if the little beep telling me I have a text message rings. I'll hear and notice that even if my phone is in a different room in my house. But, the call ringtone? I don't hear that even if it's right next to me sometimes.
Wednesday, October 04, 2006
Incompetent People Really Have No Clue, Studies Find / They're blind to own failings, others' skills
Incompetent People Really Have No Clue, Studies Find / They're blind to own failings, others' skills
Since I often worry that I'm not nearly as competent as I should be or as I feel that others think I am, I find this article, oddly, reassuring.
OTOH, if I thought I was brilliant, than presumably this article wouldn't change anything about how I felt about myself since I would assume that it didn't have anything to do with me.
So, since the article made me feel smarter does that mean that now I'm dumber than I was before I read it?
Sometimes I crack me up.
Hmmm... the research also shows that people who aren't funny often think they are, I think. All I know is I make ME laugh. :-)
Since I often worry that I'm not nearly as competent as I should be or as I feel that others think I am, I find this article, oddly, reassuring.
OTOH, if I thought I was brilliant, than presumably this article wouldn't change anything about how I felt about myself since I would assume that it didn't have anything to do with me.
So, since the article made me feel smarter does that mean that now I'm dumber than I was before I read it?
Hmmm... the research also shows that people who aren't funny often think they are, I think. All I know is I make ME laugh. :-)
Monday, October 02, 2006
Scarlett Johansson
I can't stand her. She irritates the hell outta me.
Yeah, it's *probably* jealousy on some level, but knowing that doesn't make her any less irritating.
Damn her hair and her skin and her boobs. Especially her boobs. They *really* irritate me.
And how the hell does someone who's only 21 carry herself with such grace and sophistication? I mean, c'mon. That's just not normal.
If anyone has video of her tripping or stumbling, please let me know. Until I see that I will simply believe that she is not human. She's really like the alien from Species. I'm sure of it.
Yeah, it's *probably* jealousy on some level, but knowing that doesn't make her any less irritating.
Damn her hair and her skin and her boobs. Especially her boobs. They *really* irritate me.
And how the hell does someone who's only 21 carry herself with such grace and sophistication? I mean, c'mon. That's just not normal.
If anyone has video of her tripping or stumbling, please let me know. Until I see that I will simply believe that she is not human. She's really like the alien from Species. I'm sure of it.
What I'd intended
I never actually take the time to write letters to the editor of magazines I read. However, I often have a LOT to say after reading something. So, part of my original intent of this blog was just to have a place to say it. It's quick and easy and highly likely that no one is going to read it. :-)
Yes, I know I use smileys too much.
So, *if* I start doing what I'd orginally intended to do there may soon be a lot of ranting and raving and significantly more posts here.
Just letting my 3 or 4 readers know.
Yes, I know I use smileys too much.
So, *if* I start doing what I'd orginally intended to do there may soon be a lot of ranting and raving and significantly more posts here.
Just letting my 3 or 4 readers know.
Wednesday, September 20, 2006
Research shows who dies when and where
This study reminded me of how statistics and odds are sometimes (always?) almost meaningless.
Usually you hear what the average lifespan for an American man or woman is. Gender and nationality are factored in, but not race or location within the country. But, this study shows that those factors make a huge difference in your expected life expectancy.
"Asians can expect to live more than 15 years longer than high-risk urban blacks."
Now, I'm making an assumption here -- I want to admit that I haven't looked to see if this is accurate -- I'm assuming that urban black males have a high risk of dying young. And by young, I mean in their 20s or earlier, not young as in just younger than when most people die. So, what if you have an urban black male who is already 50 years old? Is his life expectancy still the same as an urban black male who is 5?
I know this has been pointed out to me before; odds don't really apply to a single individual person. I'm a white middle-class female living in a suburban area. This study predicts my life expectancy. But it doesn't take into account a LOT of other factors that are specific to just me. My family's health history, my personal habits, etc.
I've really liked stats classes I've taken. But, I think I fundametally don't *get* stats. I wish I did.
And that reminds me of another thing I don't get regarding stats... why is it that when there's a 40% chance of rain everyone acts as though it's *going* to rain??? It's more likely that it's NOT going to rain, right? But, hearing there's a 40% chance, people say "Oh, it's going to rain today."
I do not get it.
This study reminded me of how statistics and odds are sometimes (always?) almost meaningless.
Usually you hear what the average lifespan for an American man or woman is. Gender and nationality are factored in, but not race or location within the country. But, this study shows that those factors make a huge difference in your expected life expectancy.
"Asians can expect to live more than 15 years longer than high-risk urban blacks."
Now, I'm making an assumption here -- I want to admit that I haven't looked to see if this is accurate -- I'm assuming that urban black males have a high risk of dying young. And by young, I mean in their 20s or earlier, not young as in just younger than when most people die. So, what if you have an urban black male who is already 50 years old? Is his life expectancy still the same as an urban black male who is 5?
I know this has been pointed out to me before; odds don't really apply to a single individual person. I'm a white middle-class female living in a suburban area. This study predicts my life expectancy. But it doesn't take into account a LOT of other factors that are specific to just me. My family's health history, my personal habits, etc.
I've really liked stats classes I've taken. But, I think I fundametally don't *get* stats. I wish I did.
And that reminds me of another thing I don't get regarding stats... why is it that when there's a 40% chance of rain everyone acts as though it's *going* to rain??? It's more likely that it's NOT going to rain, right? But, hearing there's a 40% chance, people say "Oh, it's going to rain today."
I do not get it.
Monday, September 11, 2006
So, it's been a while since I posted. Oh well.
And this is a *really* cheesy post, I know.
Where were you and what were you doing this morning five years ago today? Can't help but remember, right? It became a cliche even before a day had passed, probably.
I first heard about the planes hitting the towers when I got in my car on the way to work. I was living in Urbana, IL. My car's radio station was set to NPR and they were reporting on it. My first thought was that it was some sort of anniversary of the World Trade Center bombing of 1993 -- not immediately remembering exactly what year that had happened or that it had been winter. I'd been in NYC during that one.
By the time I got to work I had a better understanding of what had happened and I immediately went online to get more info. (Whoa, that there's an indication of how much had changed since 1993, huh?) We had a small tv at work that we tried to get reception on and watch -- didn't work very well and the web was a much better source of info. Then people slowly got back to work. I went home for lunch and was in complete shock that there were people just walking around campus as though nothing was different. I was actually pissed off about that. I couldn't understand how there could be a single person who didn't feel traumatized and ready to break into tears. Actually, I still can't.
I still get teary-eyed when I *really* think about it -- as opposed to just thinking about it, I don't know, I guess "politically" or as simply a news event. When I read stories about the women (mostly) who were engaged to people who died in the attack. Even just reading about that 9/11 documentary about that firehouse in NYC. Total waterworks. It surprises me since I don't think of myself as "emotional."
The actual attack itself is just something I don't think I will ever be able to think about or talk about "rationally." I can have discussions about what the United States has done to make other groups hate us. I can rationally discuss what some terrorist groups might be "right" about. I can NOT talk about anything remotely similar to how the 9/11 WTC attack might have been deserved, which I've heard people voice. "Just shut the F up if that's what you're going to suggest to me!"
And normally, I *love* having discussions with people about things that I disagree with. I'm always open to having my mind changed. BUT there are a few exceptions to that. A few things that I am just NOT open to having my mind changed about and since I know myself well enough to know that that's possible, I'll admit up front that I just don't want to discuss it. One is the existence of a higher power. People who are SO certain that they KNOW there IS one and exactly what he/she wants or is like piss me off. OTOH, I don't want to be convinced that a higher power doesn't exist either. I like believing that one does and I don't see what the harm is in possibly being wrong about that. (I don't mind someone trying to convince me that there IS harm in being wrong, though. I suppose if someone changed my view on that then I might be open to being convinced that there is no higher power, too. But not now.) Two: Let's not argue about pro-choice vs. pro-life. It's not so much that I don't think my point of view can be changed as that I don't think it's a decidable issue. (The issue being whether or not abortion is murder.) Kind of like the belief in a higher power or not -- it's just NOT knowable. And I can't help but wonder if that has something to do with Godel's Theorem, but I never have the patience to go figure that out. And third: 9/11 WTC. I just do NOT want to discuss the morality of it. NO no no. I just can't. I don't even know anyone who was killed. I don't even know anyone who KNOWS anyone who was killed. Yet it's still just too close and emotional for me to discuss. End of story.
Now, really, having only three issues that I don't feel able to debate with a clear rational mind isn't too bad, is it?
Wow, I go off on tangents a lot...
And this is a *really* cheesy post, I know.
Where were you and what were you doing this morning five years ago today? Can't help but remember, right? It became a cliche even before a day had passed, probably.
I first heard about the planes hitting the towers when I got in my car on the way to work. I was living in Urbana, IL. My car's radio station was set to NPR and they were reporting on it. My first thought was that it was some sort of anniversary of the World Trade Center bombing of 1993 -- not immediately remembering exactly what year that had happened or that it had been winter. I'd been in NYC during that one.
By the time I got to work I had a better understanding of what had happened and I immediately went online to get more info. (Whoa, that there's an indication of how much had changed since 1993, huh?) We had a small tv at work that we tried to get reception on and watch -- didn't work very well and the web was a much better source of info. Then people slowly got back to work. I went home for lunch and was in complete shock that there were people just walking around campus as though nothing was different. I was actually pissed off about that. I couldn't understand how there could be a single person who didn't feel traumatized and ready to break into tears. Actually, I still can't.
I still get teary-eyed when I *really* think about it -- as opposed to just thinking about it, I don't know, I guess "politically" or as simply a news event. When I read stories about the women (mostly) who were engaged to people who died in the attack. Even just reading about that 9/11 documentary about that firehouse in NYC. Total waterworks. It surprises me since I don't think of myself as "emotional."
The actual attack itself is just something I don't think I will ever be able to think about or talk about "rationally." I can have discussions about what the United States has done to make other groups hate us. I can rationally discuss what some terrorist groups might be "right" about. I can NOT talk about anything remotely similar to how the 9/11 WTC attack might have been deserved, which I've heard people voice. "Just shut the F up if that's what you're going to suggest to me!"
And normally, I *love* having discussions with people about things that I disagree with. I'm always open to having my mind changed. BUT there are a few exceptions to that. A few things that I am just NOT open to having my mind changed about and since I know myself well enough to know that that's possible, I'll admit up front that I just don't want to discuss it. One is the existence of a higher power. People who are SO certain that they KNOW there IS one and exactly what he/she wants or is like piss me off. OTOH, I don't want to be convinced that a higher power doesn't exist either. I like believing that one does and I don't see what the harm is in possibly being wrong about that. (I don't mind someone trying to convince me that there IS harm in being wrong, though. I suppose if someone changed my view on that then I might be open to being convinced that there is no higher power, too. But not now.) Two: Let's not argue about pro-choice vs. pro-life. It's not so much that I don't think my point of view can be changed as that I don't think it's a decidable issue. (The issue being whether or not abortion is murder.) Kind of like the belief in a higher power or not -- it's just NOT knowable.
Now, really, having only three issues that I don't feel able to debate with a clear rational mind isn't too bad, is it?
Wow, I go off on tangents a lot...
Thursday, June 01, 2006
I'm at my 10 year college reunion. Well, it doesn't actually start until tomorrow morning. Damn, I feel old.
I absolutely adore my school. The personality of the school fit me so well.
The weird thing is... I didn't really have any close friends here. At all. I transferred here for my junior and senior years. Even without a group of friends I loved it. But, why am I at the reunion? I don't know anyone. There are at least two people who are supposed to be coming who I remember fondly, but I don't know how well they will remember me.
I'm staying in one of the dorms. Free wireless. Yippee!
Did I mention this is just weird? Well, lets see how it goes...
I absolutely adore my school. The personality of the school fit me so well.
The weird thing is... I didn't really have any close friends here. At all. I transferred here for my junior and senior years. Even without a group of friends I loved it. But, why am I at the reunion? I don't know anyone. There are at least two people who are supposed to be coming who I remember fondly, but I don't know how well they will remember me.
I'm staying in one of the dorms. Free wireless. Yippee!
Did I mention this is just weird? Well, lets see how it goes...
Tuesday, May 30, 2006
Stupid school!!!
Dominican University, where I earned my Master's in Library and Information Science in 2004, is claiming that I owe them tuition for classes taken in, get this, 2005.
No, I did not take classes there after I graduated. I have asked them over and over, via email, telephone, and mail, to tell me what classes these are that I supposedly took and did not pay for. Nothing. All they can tell me is their records say I owe them "tuition."
I paid for my tuituion to Dominican entirely with loans. Which I am paying off. (And which I consolidated at a kick-ass low rate, btw.)
So, now they've passed it on to a collection agency who is repeatedly calling my house. When I was finally home to talk to the lady that's calling, she was immediately bitchy. So, I was bitchy back. But then, I tried to explain that I DO NOT owe Dominican money and surely she has some sort of proof of how much I owe them and, more importantly, for what. Nope. She says she just knows I owe them money from 2005. I tried to explain that I payed for all of my tuition via loans and she tried to tell me that loans almost never cover tuition. Huh??? Somehow the fact that her children were older than me pertained to this.
Actually, the phone call ended calmly. I have to fax a written request for a "documentation of charges." And I bet all that's going to be is the same sheet of paper Domincan was sending me before that said "Tuition owed: $XXXX.XX" Yeah, that's helpful. But it's the first step, I guess.
I'm really pissed at Dominican. I love the faculty that teaches there. I really do. But the administration is seriously f*cked up. I know it's not just with me. I've heard lots of goofy stories of records being lost, registrations not working, etc.
ARGHHHHH!
Dominican University, where I earned my Master's in Library and Information Science in 2004, is claiming that I owe them tuition for classes taken in, get this, 2005.
No, I did not take classes there after I graduated. I have asked them over and over, via email, telephone, and mail, to tell me what classes these are that I supposedly took and did not pay for. Nothing. All they can tell me is their records say I owe them "tuition."
I paid for my tuituion to Dominican entirely with loans. Which I am paying off. (And which I consolidated at a kick-ass low rate, btw.)
So, now they've passed it on to a collection agency who is repeatedly calling my house. When I was finally home to talk to the lady that's calling, she was immediately bitchy. So, I was bitchy back. But then, I tried to explain that I DO NOT owe Dominican money and surely she has some sort of proof of how much I owe them and, more importantly, for what. Nope. She says she just knows I owe them money from 2005. I tried to explain that I payed for all of my tuition via loans and she tried to tell me that loans almost never cover tuition. Huh??? Somehow the fact that her children were older than me pertained to this.
Actually, the phone call ended calmly. I have to fax a written request for a "documentation of charges." And I bet all that's going to be is the same sheet of paper Domincan was sending me before that said "Tuition owed: $XXXX.XX" Yeah, that's helpful. But it's the first step, I guess.
I'm really pissed at Dominican. I love the faculty that teaches there. I really do. But the administration is seriously f*cked up. I know it's not just with me. I've heard lots of goofy stories of records being lost, registrations not working, etc.
ARGHHHHH!
Saturday, May 06, 2006
Monday, May 01, 2006
Geeky high school guys.
I wish I could reassure all those geeky high school guys who are NOT having the best times during their adolescence that there is always hope.
Personally, I've dated two guys who were *definitely* geeky-looking in high school, but who were HOT in their 20s and 30s.
But, the hero for these guys really should be Patrick Dempsey.
From Can't Buy Me Love's Ronald Miller
to Grey's Anatomy's Dr. Shepherd.
Yummy.
geeks
hotties
Patrick+Dempsey
highschool
I wish I could reassure all those geeky high school guys who are NOT having the best times during their adolescence that there is always hope.
Personally, I've dated two guys who were *definitely* geeky-looking in high school, but who were HOT in their 20s and 30s.
But, the hero for these guys really should be Patrick Dempsey.
From Can't Buy Me Love's Ronald Miller
to Grey's Anatomy's Dr. Shepherd.
Yummy.
geeks
hotties
Patrick+Dempsey
highschool
Wednesday, April 26, 2006
Dum-Dum
I quit smoking 2 months, 2 weeks, and 6 days ago. I still feel the need to put something in my mouth when I'm driving. I just automatically grab for my cigarettes. So, instead, I've been eating Dum-Dum lollipops. This morning...
HORROR
I realized I'd run out.
I need to go shopping.
smoking
lollipops
I quit smoking 2 months, 2 weeks, and 6 days ago. I still feel the need to put something in my mouth when I'm driving. I just automatically grab for my cigarettes. So, instead, I've been eating Dum-Dum lollipops. This morning...
HORROR
I realized I'd run out.
I need to go shopping.
smoking
lollipops
Man kills mother, grills part of body - Yahoo! News
Just a passing thought... why is it more interesting that he tried to grill part of her body than it is that he killed her? Would baking her have been less or more interesting?
Read more at news.yahoo.com/news
murder
matricide
Tuesday, April 18, 2006
Oh, no! Criminals on MySpace!
Puh-leeze. So, there are people who are registered sex offenders who also have a profile on MySpace. You know what? There might be people who have served time for murder on there, too. Oh, but wait... it's only sex offenders who are required to carry their crimes with them all of their lives.
Yeah, I have a problem with the whole idea of registering sex offenders. They have served their time. If they have such a huge tendency to commit similar crimes again, how about we make their sentences longer? What a crazy idea.
The article states:
Wired News ran the names of randomly selected registered sex offenders in San Francisco and neighboring Sonoma County through MySpace's user search engine, and turned up no fewer than five men whose self-reported names, photographs, ages, astrological signs, locations and (in two instances) heights matched those of profiles on the state's online sex offender registry.
and
All of their online profiles, which understandably make no mention of their crimes, were surprisingly easy to find.
Ok, so then anyone can do the same. I don't think the people at Wired News have some sort of special skills that allowed them to find these profiles.
The article also points out that these people are not breaking any laws by having profiles on the site. Of course the don't include their criminal history in their profile. Other types of criminals probably don't either. And, OMG, they MISPORTRAY (which according to Merriam-Webster isn't a word?) themselves!!! Shock! Horror! I'm sure NONE of the teens using the site do THAT!
Blech!
MySpace
sex+offenders
rant
Puh-leeze. So, there are people who are registered sex offenders who also have a profile on MySpace. You know what? There might be people who have served time for murder on there, too. Oh, but wait... it's only sex offenders who are required to carry their crimes with them all of their lives.
Yeah, I have a problem with the whole idea of registering sex offenders. They have served their time. If they have such a huge tendency to commit similar crimes again, how about we make their sentences longer? What a crazy idea.
The article states:
Wired News ran the names of randomly selected registered sex offenders in San Francisco and neighboring Sonoma County through MySpace's user search engine, and turned up no fewer than five men whose self-reported names, photographs, ages, astrological signs, locations and (in two instances) heights matched those of profiles on the state's online sex offender registry.
and
All of their online profiles, which understandably make no mention of their crimes, were surprisingly easy to find.
Ok, so then anyone can do the same. I don't think the people at Wired News have some sort of special skills that allowed them to find these profiles.
The article also points out that these people are not breaking any laws by having profiles on the site. Of course the don't include their criminal history in their profile. Other types of criminals probably don't either. And, OMG, they MISPORTRAY (which according to Merriam-Webster isn't a word?) themselves!!! Shock! Horror! I'm sure NONE of the teens using the site do THAT!
Blech!
MySpace
sex+offenders
rant
Monday, April 03, 2006
I guess sex really does sell.
Hi MeFites.
And hi, Mom. Mom, don't click on the links. Really. You don't want to. I mean, you can if you want to. But, you don't.
I posted a question on ask.metafilter Friday, March 31st, about some sex-related websites. I had 76 visits to this blog on March 31st. Coincidence? I think not. ;-)
Sorry it's so boring, MeFites!
MetaFilter
sex
Hi MeFites.
And hi, Mom. Mom, don't click on the links. Really. You don't want to. I mean, you can if you want to. But, you don't.
I posted a question on ask.metafilter Friday, March 31st, about some sex-related websites. I had 76 visits to this blog on March 31st. Coincidence? I think not. ;-)
Sorry it's so boring, MeFites!
MetaFilter
sex
Friday, March 31, 2006
Thursday, March 30, 2006
9/11 Tapes Revive Lost Voices, and Families' Pain
Wow. The article starts out talking about some families who don't want to hear the tapes of their family members' voicess. I don't know that I would be able to not listen.
Will Sept. 11 ever be over, Debbie Andreacchio wondered...
I can't imagine what it must be like for the people who lost someone on 9/11. I still get teary when I read an article like this. And, really, I'm not an easily-gets-teary girl. I still get surprised at myself sometimes.
911
Wow. The article starts out talking about some families who don't want to hear the tapes of their family members' voicess. I don't know that I would be able to not listen.
Will Sept. 11 ever be over, Debbie Andreacchio wondered...
I can't imagine what it must be like for the people who lost someone on 9/11. I still get teary when I read an article like this. And, really, I'm not an easily-gets-teary girl. I still get surprised at myself sometimes.
911
Tuesday, March 28, 2006
Jellybeans.
The problem with jellybeans is that they are so small that it's not very satisfying to eat just one, but since each color has its own distinct flavor you either end up with a jumble of flavors in your mouth or you have to be really ridiculous and sort out a bunch of the same flavor to eat together.
jellybeans
The problem with jellybeans is that they are so small that it's not very satisfying to eat just one, but since each color has its own distinct flavor you either end up with a jumble of flavors in your mouth or you have to be really ridiculous and sort out a bunch of the same flavor to eat together.
jellybeans
Wednesday, March 08, 2006
PostSecret
Yeah, Yeah. I know it's been around for a while now and there's even a book. But, still, I had to say...
I think PostSecret is one of the mostest beautiful things out there on the web.
No. Really.
There's more talk more about the internet isolating people than there is about how it unites people. Not that PostSecret unites people exactly. But, would you ever really really believe that there's truly someone else out there who writes letters they don't send? Or secretly enjoys life? (Just two recent examples...) I even find it enlightening to read the secrets that I don't empathize with. Tangent: I'm from Chicago. I'm allowed to end a sentence with "with."
Go ahead. Laugh. I'm sitting here feeling all warm and fuzzy inside.
PostSecret
Yeah, Yeah. I know it's been around for a while now and there's even a book. But, still, I had to say...
I think PostSecret is one of the mostest beautiful things out there on the web.
No. Really.
There's more talk more about the internet isolating people than there is about how it unites people. Not that PostSecret unites people exactly. But, would you ever really really believe that there's truly someone else out there who writes letters they don't send? Or secretly enjoys life? (Just two recent examples...) I even find it enlightening to read the secrets that I don't empathize with. Tangent: I'm from Chicago. I'm allowed to end a sentence with "with."
Go ahead. Laugh. I'm sitting here feeling all warm and fuzzy inside.
PostSecret
Biological Psychology
I just discovered this journal. It's so cool! There's a bunch of articles about the biology of, ahem, arousal. I find that kind of stuff fascinating. The science of sex.
Some sample article titles:
I'm so easily amused...
biological
psychology
journal
sex
I just discovered this journal. It's so cool! There's a bunch of articles about the biology of, ahem, arousal. I find that kind of stuff fascinating. The science of sex.
Some sample article titles:
- Women's preferences for sexual dimorphism in height depend on menstrual cycle phase and expected duration of relationship. [Abstract]
- More frequent partner hugs and higher oxytocin levels are linked to lower blood pressure and heart rate in premenopausal women. [Abstract]
- Men's ratings of female attractiveness are influenced more by changes in female waist size compared with changes in hip size. [Abstract]
- A preliminary report relating frequency of vaginal intercourse to heart rate variability, Valsalva ratio, blood pressure, and cohabitation status. [Abstract]
I'm so easily amused...
biological
psychology
journal
sex
Tuesday, March 07, 2006
The Game by Neil Strauss
I loved this book. For those that don't know, it's about a community of guys who become experts at seduction. It's non-fiction. There's a gazillion communities online that most people have no idea about. I'm sure they exist off-line, too, but I'm mainly aware of the ones that have grown over the internet.
Anyway, I'm really not good at summarizing what books are about. If I were, I'd probably spend a damn lot of my time doing it since I read so many books. So, if you want a summary, go to the one on Amazon.
So, as a female, why would I love this book? It's not because it lets me in on all the tricks these guys use, though that is kind of neat. First, I like the idea of there being these guys interested in seduction out there. I enjoy being seduced. It's a great feeling. I like that this book tells how it can all go wrong if too much effort and attention is put on the technique rather than enjoying the "game" itself. I enjoy being seduced by a guy who really enjoys women. I don't enjoy being seduced by a guy who's trying to get back at women who have rejected him. That's like that game where you're supposed to fall backwards and trust that the other person will catch you. But, they don't. Or, when someone tries to trick you into doing or saying something that makes you seem stupid. And then they laugh at you. I HATE that.
The thing is, even though I've read the book and read about the techniques, I'm completely confident that they would work on me. Even if I was aware that the guy was using them. Seriously. It's good stuff.
Oh, except there's a technique they talk about in the book called negging. It's basically playfully insulting the girl so as to rile her up a bit and also to show that he's not one of those guys who's just blown away by her looks. That technique, at least with me could seriously backfire. Not always, but sometimes. How do I explain? If a guy negged me about something I was sensitive about, I'd be pissed off, not intrigued. However, if he negged me about something I was kind of secretly proud of, I'd probably fall for it. Trying to think of concrete examples... oh well. Hope it makes sense anyway.
I wish there were instructions out there for women to seduce men. Supposedly The Art of Seduction can be used by either gender, but I haven't read it yet.
books
pickupartist
PUA
I loved this book. For those that don't know, it's about a community of guys who become experts at seduction. It's non-fiction. There's a gazillion communities online that most people have no idea about. I'm sure they exist off-line, too, but I'm mainly aware of the ones that have grown over the internet.
Anyway, I'm really not good at summarizing what books are about. If I were, I'd probably spend a damn lot of my time doing it since I read so many books. So, if you want a summary, go to the one on Amazon.
So, as a female, why would I love this book? It's not because it lets me in on all the tricks these guys use, though that is kind of neat. First, I like the idea of there being these guys interested in seduction out there. I enjoy being seduced. It's a great feeling. I like that this book tells how it can all go wrong if too much effort and attention is put on the technique rather than enjoying the "game" itself. I enjoy being seduced by a guy who really enjoys women. I don't enjoy being seduced by a guy who's trying to get back at women who have rejected him. That's like that game where you're supposed to fall backwards and trust that the other person will catch you. But, they don't. Or, when someone tries to trick you into doing or saying something that makes you seem stupid. And then they laugh at you. I HATE that.
The thing is, even though I've read the book and read about the techniques, I'm completely confident that they would work on me. Even if I was aware that the guy was using them. Seriously. It's good stuff.
Oh, except there's a technique they talk about in the book called negging. It's basically playfully insulting the girl so as to rile her up a bit and also to show that he's not one of those guys who's just blown away by her looks. That technique, at least with me could seriously backfire. Not always, but sometimes. How do I explain? If a guy negged me about something I was sensitive about, I'd be pissed off, not intrigued. However, if he negged me about something I was kind of secretly proud of, I'd probably fall for it. Trying to think of concrete examples... oh well. Hope it makes sense anyway.
I wish there were instructions out there for women to seduce men. Supposedly The Art of Seduction can be used by either gender, but I haven't read it yet.
books
pickupartist
PUA
Tuesday, February 21, 2006
Amazon.com
I use Amazon a lot for recommendations. Most books that I read I end up getting from the library, but I try to use Amazon for purchases because I use their services so much. There's a whole bunch of blogs about Google that detail news, updates, changes, etc. but so far I haven't found any at all for Amazon and I'm too lazy to make one myself.
Anyway... recently I noticed a change at Amazon Books. It used to be that when I did a search for a title there would be icons next to some of the search results indicating that that book was recommended for me. I LOVED that feature. I keep this ridiculously anal list of books that I want to read and would add books to it based on that icon ALL THE TIME. Now, it's gone. It still shows up on the main Amazon books page, but not in the search results pages.
So, I thought I'd email Amazon and see if that feature had been done away with or if it was just temporarily gone. I've emailed Amazon in the past with questions about both their website and about my orders and I've always been amazed at how quickly and thoroughly they'd answer. So, this time I was surprised. Below is most of the back and forth emails sent. (Not all because one of my emails includes an earlier email.)
> Date: Tue Feb 14 03:57:01 UTC 2006
> Subject; Recommendations
> To: int-primary__4r4t4y@amazon.com
> From: ME
>
> ---------------
> 02/13/06 19:56:39
> NAME: ME
> ORDER ID:
> ITEMS:
>
> COMMENTS: I think this is something I should be emailing customer
service
> about instead of posting on the discussion boards...
>
> It appears that the "recommended for you" icon is no longer
showing up in
> my search results. Is that feature coming back? Is it possible
that it's
> not showing up because I've switched from Internet Explorer to
Mozilla
> Firefox?
>
> Thanks,
> ME
From: "Amazon.com Customer Service"
[Add to Address Book]
To: ME
Subject: Your Amazon.com Inquiry
Date: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 03:21:47 PM [View Source]
Thank you for contacting Amazon.com.
I apologize if you are having difficulty with our website. I have
looked into this matter and found that Amazon.com's web site should
appear the same regardless which browser you use. It appears that
maybe you need to clear your cookies files.
If this solution does not work please contact us back.
Thank you for shopping Amazon.com.
Please let us know if this e-mail resolved your question:
If yes, click here:
http://www.amazon.com/rsvp-y?c=ryxyuvtt3233614577
If not, click here:
http://www.amazon.com/rsvp-n?c=ryxyuvtt3233614577
Please note: this e-mail was sent from an address that cannot accept
incoming e-mail.
To contact us about an unrelated issue, please visit the Help
section of our web site.
Best regards,
Becky
Amazon.com Customer Service
http://www.amazon.com
==============================
Check your order and more: http://www.amazon.com/your-account
ref_id:=ceyquvtt1086141488
This didn't work, so I emailed them again:
> Date: Mon Feb 20 17:57:13 UTC 2006
> Subject; HMD Feedback to Amazon.com
> To: int-form-feedback__34erdf@amazon.com
> From: ME
>
> ---------------
> 02/20/06 09:57:12
> NAME: ME
> COMM ID: ryxyuvtt3233614577
> COMMENTS: I did try clearing the cache and the cookies as well as
using an entirely different computer. The icons are still gone. The
Amazon Books page still shows the little lightbulbs with the text
Why? next to books that are recommended. However, say I do a search
of "The Baby Book". In the past, the search results page would show
the book The Baby Book: Everything You Need to Know About Your Baby
from Birth to Age Two (Revised and Updated Edition) -- by James
Sears, et al, as well as other similar books. Next to that book and
many of the others would be the lightbulb icon, indicating that book
was recommended to me personally. That no longer happens. For any
books at all.
>
> It's not as though this is a serious problem or anything like
that. It was just a feature I *really* liked on Amazon and was
curious as to whether it was gone forever.
>
> Thanks,
> ME
Their response:
From: "Amazon.com Customer Service"
[Add to Address Book]
To: ME
Subject: Your Amazon.com Inquiry
Date: Monday, February 20, 2006 03:44:58 PM [View Source]
Thanks for writing us at Amazon.com.
I am sorry to hear that the "recommended for you" icon is not
appearing in your account.
Many common problems can be solved by adjusting your browser
settings:
1) Try reloading. If the site is taking a long time, or if a page
loads for a long, long time, click the "Stop" button at the top of
your browser and then click "Reload" or "Refresh" at the top of your
browser window.
2) Clear your cache. Most browsers temporarily store a local copy of
every page you visit on the web. Clearing your cache deletes all of
those files and makes room for new ones. You can find information on
clearing your cache by consulting the Help link on your browser menu.
3) Clear your cookies. Cookies are short pieces of data that are
stored by your web browser that help to recognize you automatically
whenever you return to our site and let you take advantage of the
many personalization and recommendation features we offer. They also
are necessary for our 1-Click Shopping and Shopping Cart to work
efficiently. If a cookie becomes corrupted on your computer, it may
cause you to have difficulty using Amazon.com. Please consult your
browser's Help menu for instructions on removing cookies. Removing
old or damaged cookies will allow new cookies to be created when you
visit us next time.
4) Try our standard server. If you have trouble accessing the order
form, or if the order form gives you an error on the final step,
using the standard server should allow the order to go through. You
can select the standard server when you enter your e-mail address and
password after clicking "Proceed to Checkout." When submitting an
order on the standard server, if we don't already have your credit
card number on file, it's best to enter just the last five digits of
the card number and then call us with the complete number after
placing the order.
If these suggestions fail to solve the problem and you believe there
may be a technical error on Amazon.com, please click the link below
to send us a detailed description of how to duplicate the the error
and where it is occurring. We can then notify the correct team to
ensure the problem is corrected.
Thanks for shopping with Amazon.com.
Please visit the following link to provide the information we
requested:
http://www.amazon.com/rsvp-mi?c=fatyucxt3231976477&q=o2r
Please note: this e-mail was sent from an address that cannot accept
incoming e-mail. Please use the link above to send us your reply.
Best regards,
Narendra Prasad
Amazon.com Customer Service
http://www.amazon.com
==============================
Check your order and more: http://www.amazon.com/your-account
ref_id:=yuyeucxt1084504895
My response to that details how absolutely ridiculous this advice is, in case it's not obvious.
> Date: Tue Feb 21 14:54:29 UTC 2006
> Subject; Additional Information
> To: int-orders2__poiqwe@amazon.com
> From: ME
>
> ---------------
> 02/21/06 06:54:28
> NAME: ME
> COMM ID: fatyucxt3231976477
> COMMENTS: I've copied below the email I received from Amazon so
that I can refer to it.
>
> Hopefully, it will be possible for someone to respond that has
actually read the email I sent.
>
> Re 1, 2, and 3. I clearly mentioned already that I did try to
clear the cache, clear the cookies, and used different computers.
>
> Re 4. My question had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with
ordering.
>
> Re "please click the link below
> to send us a detailed description of how to duplicate the the
error
> and where it is occurring." I DID send a detailed description,
even giving an exact title for an example.
>
> As I ALSO mentioned, it's not as though this problem is a big
deal. It's not stopping me from ordering through Amazon. This
ridiculous reply I received, though, might. However, in the past, I
have only had absolutely wonderful encounters with customer service -
- above and beyond what most companies provide or that I would ever
expect. I've realized by now, after a week, that the recommended
for you icon is probably not going to return to my search results
since I've noticed in the past that when there's a change in
features, it only lasts a day or two if it's temporary. I'm just
kind of ticked off that instead of a response that made sense --
even if it was just "I don't know" -- I got one that showed that
there was no way the customer service representative either read or
understood my question.
>
> Thank you,
> ME
From: "Amazon.com Customer Service"
[Add to Address Book]
To: ME
Subject: Your Amazon.com Inquiry
Date: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:26:42 AM [View Source]
Hello from Amazon.com.
I have reviewed our previous correspondence with you, and I offer my
sincere apologies for any misunderstanding thus far.
I went through the process that you described and there was not
signal that you had made a recommendation for the book "The Baby
Book: Everything You Need to Know About Your Baby
from Birth to Age Two (Revised and Updated Edition)."
It is always important for us to hear how customers react to all
aspects of shopping at Amazon.com. Strong customer feedback like
yours helps us continue to improve the selection and service we
provide, and we appreciate the time you took to write to us.
I have already passed your message on to the appropriate department
in our company for consideration. Customer feedback like yours is
very important in helping us continue to improve the selection and
service we provide.
Thank you for shopping at Amazon.com. We hope to see you again soon.
Best regards,
Susie B.
Amazon.com Customer Service
http://www.amazon.com
==============================
Check your order and more: http://www.amazon.com/your-account
ref_id:=hecedtct1085422599
I give up.
And I know this is a very un-PC thing of me to wonder, but I do wonder if Amazon has, since I've last communicated with them, outsourced their customer service operations abroad. Do these people not understand English? Or they're not really familiar with the website itself?
ARRRGH.
Amazon
customerservicebooks
recommendations
I use Amazon a lot for recommendations. Most books that I read I end up getting from the library, but I try to use Amazon for purchases because I use their services so much. There's a whole bunch of blogs about Google that detail news, updates, changes, etc. but so far I haven't found any at all for Amazon and I'm too lazy to make one myself.
Anyway... recently I noticed a change at Amazon Books. It used to be that when I did a search for a title there would be icons next to some of the search results indicating that that book was recommended for me. I LOVED that feature. I keep this ridiculously anal list of books that I want to read and would add books to it based on that icon ALL THE TIME. Now, it's gone. It still shows up on the main Amazon books page, but not in the search results pages.
So, I thought I'd email Amazon and see if that feature had been done away with or if it was just temporarily gone. I've emailed Amazon in the past with questions about both their website and about my orders and I've always been amazed at how quickly and thoroughly they'd answer. So, this time I was surprised. Below is most of the back and forth emails sent. (Not all because one of my emails includes an earlier email.)
> Date: Tue Feb 14 03:57:01 UTC 2006
> Subject; Recommendations
> To: int-primary__4r4t4y@amazon.com
> From: ME
>
> ---------------
> 02/13/06 19:56:39
> NAME: ME
> ORDER ID:
> ITEMS:
>
> COMMENTS: I think this is something I should be emailing customer
service
> about instead of posting on the discussion boards...
>
> It appears that the "recommended for you" icon is no longer
showing up in
> my search results. Is that feature coming back? Is it possible
that it's
> not showing up because I've switched from Internet Explorer to
Mozilla
> Firefox?
>
> Thanks,
> ME
From: "Amazon.com Customer Service"
[Add to Address Book]
To: ME
Subject: Your Amazon.com Inquiry
Date: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 03:21:47 PM [View Source]
Thank you for contacting Amazon.com.
I apologize if you are having difficulty with our website. I have
looked into this matter and found that Amazon.com's web site should
appear the same regardless which browser you use. It appears that
maybe you need to clear your cookies files.
If this solution does not work please contact us back.
Thank you for shopping Amazon.com.
Please let us know if this e-mail resolved your question:
If yes, click here:
http://www.amazon.com/rsvp-y?c=ryxyuvtt3233614577
If not, click here:
http://www.amazon.com/rsvp-n?c=ryxyuvtt3233614577
Please note: this e-mail was sent from an address that cannot accept
incoming e-mail.
To contact us about an unrelated issue, please visit the Help
section of our web site.
Best regards,
Becky
Amazon.com Customer Service
http://www.amazon.com
==============================
Check your order and more: http://www.amazon.com/your-account
ref_id:=ceyquvtt1086141488
This didn't work, so I emailed them again:
> Date: Mon Feb 20 17:57:13 UTC 2006
> Subject; HMD Feedback to Amazon.com
> To: int-form-feedback__34erdf@amazon.com
> From: ME
>
> ---------------
> 02/20/06 09:57:12
> NAME: ME
> COMM ID: ryxyuvtt3233614577
> COMMENTS: I did try clearing the cache and the cookies as well as
using an entirely different computer. The icons are still gone. The
Amazon Books page still shows the little lightbulbs with the text
Why? next to books that are recommended. However, say I do a search
of "The Baby Book". In the past, the search results page would show
the book The Baby Book: Everything You Need to Know About Your Baby
from Birth to Age Two (Revised and Updated Edition) -- by James
Sears, et al, as well as other similar books. Next to that book and
many of the others would be the lightbulb icon, indicating that book
was recommended to me personally. That no longer happens. For any
books at all.
>
> It's not as though this is a serious problem or anything like
that. It was just a feature I *really* liked on Amazon and was
curious as to whether it was gone forever.
>
> Thanks,
> ME
Their response:
From: "Amazon.com Customer Service"
[Add to Address Book]
To: ME
Subject: Your Amazon.com Inquiry
Date: Monday, February 20, 2006 03:44:58 PM [View Source]
Thanks for writing us at Amazon.com.
I am sorry to hear that the "recommended for you" icon is not
appearing in your account.
Many common problems can be solved by adjusting your browser
settings:
1) Try reloading. If the site is taking a long time, or if a page
loads for a long, long time, click the "Stop" button at the top of
your browser and then click "Reload" or "Refresh" at the top of your
browser window.
2) Clear your cache. Most browsers temporarily store a local copy of
every page you visit on the web. Clearing your cache deletes all of
those files and makes room for new ones. You can find information on
clearing your cache by consulting the Help link on your browser menu.
3) Clear your cookies. Cookies are short pieces of data that are
stored by your web browser that help to recognize you automatically
whenever you return to our site and let you take advantage of the
many personalization and recommendation features we offer. They also
are necessary for our 1-Click Shopping and Shopping Cart to work
efficiently. If a cookie becomes corrupted on your computer, it may
cause you to have difficulty using Amazon.com. Please consult your
browser's Help menu for instructions on removing cookies. Removing
old or damaged cookies will allow new cookies to be created when you
visit us next time.
4) Try our standard server. If you have trouble accessing the order
form, or if the order form gives you an error on the final step,
using the standard server should allow the order to go through. You
can select the standard server when you enter your e-mail address and
password after clicking "Proceed to Checkout." When submitting an
order on the standard server, if we don't already have your credit
card number on file, it's best to enter just the last five digits of
the card number and then call us with the complete number after
placing the order.
If these suggestions fail to solve the problem and you believe there
may be a technical error on Amazon.com, please click the link below
to send us a detailed description of how to duplicate the the error
and where it is occurring. We can then notify the correct team to
ensure the problem is corrected.
Thanks for shopping with Amazon.com.
Please visit the following link to provide the information we
requested:
http://www.amazon.com/rsvp-mi?c=fatyucxt3231976477&q=o2r
Please note: this e-mail was sent from an address that cannot accept
incoming e-mail. Please use the link above to send us your reply.
Best regards,
Narendra Prasad
Amazon.com Customer Service
http://www.amazon.com
==============================
Check your order and more: http://www.amazon.com/your-account
ref_id:=yuyeucxt1084504895
My response to that details how absolutely ridiculous this advice is, in case it's not obvious.
> Date: Tue Feb 21 14:54:29 UTC 2006
> Subject; Additional Information
> To: int-orders2__poiqwe@amazon.com
> From: ME
>
> ---------------
> 02/21/06 06:54:28
> NAME: ME
> COMM ID: fatyucxt3231976477
> COMMENTS: I've copied below the email I received from Amazon so
that I can refer to it.
>
> Hopefully, it will be possible for someone to respond that has
actually read the email I sent.
>
> Re 1, 2, and 3. I clearly mentioned already that I did try to
clear the cache, clear the cookies, and used different computers.
>
> Re 4. My question had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with
ordering.
>
> Re "please click the link below
> to send us a detailed description of how to duplicate the the
error
> and where it is occurring." I DID send a detailed description,
even giving an exact title for an example.
>
> As I ALSO mentioned, it's not as though this problem is a big
deal. It's not stopping me from ordering through Amazon. This
ridiculous reply I received, though, might. However, in the past, I
have only had absolutely wonderful encounters with customer service -
- above and beyond what most companies provide or that I would ever
expect. I've realized by now, after a week, that the recommended
for you icon is probably not going to return to my search results
since I've noticed in the past that when there's a change in
features, it only lasts a day or two if it's temporary. I'm just
kind of ticked off that instead of a response that made sense --
even if it was just "I don't know" -- I got one that showed that
there was no way the customer service representative either read or
understood my question.
>
> Thank you,
> ME
From: "Amazon.com Customer Service"
[Add to Address Book]
To: ME
Subject: Your Amazon.com Inquiry
Date: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:26:42 AM [View Source]
Hello from Amazon.com.
I have reviewed our previous correspondence with you, and I offer my
sincere apologies for any misunderstanding thus far.
I went through the process that you described and there was not
signal that you had made a recommendation for the book "The Baby
Book: Everything You Need to Know About Your Baby
from Birth to Age Two (Revised and Updated Edition)."
It is always important for us to hear how customers react to all
aspects of shopping at Amazon.com. Strong customer feedback like
yours helps us continue to improve the selection and service we
provide, and we appreciate the time you took to write to us.
I have already passed your message on to the appropriate department
in our company for consideration. Customer feedback like yours is
very important in helping us continue to improve the selection and
service we provide.
Thank you for shopping at Amazon.com. We hope to see you again soon.
Best regards,
Susie B.
Amazon.com Customer Service
http://www.amazon.com
==============================
Check your order and more: http://www.amazon.com/your-account
ref_id:=hecedtct1085422599
I give up.
And I know this is a very un-PC thing of me to wonder, but I do wonder if Amazon has, since I've last communicated with them, outsourced their customer service operations abroad. Do these people not understand English? Or they're not really familiar with the website itself?
ARRRGH.
Amazon
customerservicebooks
recommendations
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)